<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Everybody Still Loves MetaTrader 4 And What Are The Alternatives?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/</link>
	<description>A point of view on the Forex market from a trader and developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/#comment-4353</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pipburner.com/?p=759#comment-4353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree with you. That is what MetaQuotes should read and fix features that we, forex traders, don&#039;t like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you. That is what MetaQuotes should read and fix features that we, forex traders, don&#8217;t like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packer</title>
		<link>http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/#comment-4264</link>
		<dc:creator>Packer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pipburner.com/?p=759#comment-4264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MT4 is a much better and far much traders friendly platform than MT5, whatever they say they added to MT5 are nonsense if the execution functions are not acceptable to traders]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MT4 is a much better and far much traders friendly platform than MT5, whatever they say they added to MT5 are nonsense if the execution functions are not acceptable to traders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ac</title>
		<link>http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>ac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pipburner.com/?p=759#comment-2283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there&#039;s a reason brokers prefer mt-platform. If there was a trading tool that made winning too easy, the retail forex business model could be in shambles liquidity wise and end up in a retail vs retail exchange model like futures are. My belief is the so-so platforms make retail forex business more attractive to the bigger players. I mean why would a bank or hedge fund want to be sellers to retail traders if the retail had same or better tools than them and were winning most of the time...

Try studying some $$$$ trading platforms and it seems that rather simple to implement features are missing from MT platform because well, they might tip the balance and retails losers might actually end up break-even (and then there would be the 5% or more of winners). It&#039;s not fun to play video games with people with special/secret tools or just plain better players and same goes here.  I don&#039;t believe the bank traders are that much better, they are just better tooled and can pay to get the news sooner/have lower latencies. Then there&#039;s things like &quot;last look&quot; which can be gamed only by the sell side to have very decisive advantage. I didn&#039;t even mention the lack of various ways to execute orders in MT platform.

The question really is, if you are profitable with MT, would you be more profitable with something else? Given everything that&#039;s missing from MT(4) it&#039;s certainly likely.

Slippage could be a very large part of costs and MT(4) doesn&#039;t really give you everything there is available to minimize it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a reason brokers prefer mt-platform. If there was a trading tool that made winning too easy, the retail forex business model could be in shambles liquidity wise and end up in a retail vs retail exchange model like futures are. My belief is the so-so platforms make retail forex business more attractive to the bigger players. I mean why would a bank or hedge fund want to be sellers to retail traders if the retail had same or better tools than them and were winning most of the time&#8230;</p>
<p>Try studying some $$$$ trading platforms and it seems that rather simple to implement features are missing from MT platform because well, they might tip the balance and retails losers might actually end up break-even (and then there would be the 5% or more of winners). It&#8217;s not fun to play video games with people with special/secret tools or just plain better players and same goes here.  I don&#8217;t believe the bank traders are that much better, they are just better tooled and can pay to get the news sooner/have lower latencies. Then there&#8217;s things like &#8220;last look&#8221; which can be gamed only by the sell side to have very decisive advantage. I didn&#8217;t even mention the lack of various ways to execute orders in MT platform.</p>
<p>The question really is, if you are profitable with MT, would you be more profitable with something else? Given everything that&#8217;s missing from MT(4) it&#8217;s certainly likely.</p>
<p>Slippage could be a very large part of costs and MT(4) doesn&#8217;t really give you everything there is available to minimize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seekforex</title>
		<link>http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>Seekforex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pipburner.com/?p=759#comment-2217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a good and nice software. I tested it and found it useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good and nice software. I tested it and found it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason M</title>
		<link>http://pipburner.com/why-everybod-love-mt4-and-alternatives/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pipburner.com/?p=759#comment-1889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A type of web based Mt 4 would be great, something that works on all platforms. I&#039;m surprised the MT developers are behind the times with mobile computing. MT 4 is so sleek and simple, there really aren&#039;t many other great alternatives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A type of web based Mt 4 would be great, something that works on all platforms. I&#8217;m surprised the MT developers are behind the times with mobile computing. MT 4 is so sleek and simple, there really aren&#8217;t many other great alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
